Neither of these drivers were great for shot shaping. This resulted in drives that were about 7 yards longer than the X Hot. What about distance though? Testing these drivers side by side revealed a lower spin rate in favor of the Mavrik. We’ve already mentioned that the Mavrik has a nicer, stabler feel to them. The X Hot would be much more congenial to high handicappers. That being said, the good old fashioned Variable Face Thickness of the X Hot driver actually made it more forgiving than the Mavrik. If you are a player who emphasizes feel, the Mavrik’s will be more to your liking. This is probably because the jailbreak bars help stabilize your drive and contribute to feedback.
The Callaway Mavrik driver manages to reach a level of feel and distance that the X Hot simply doesn’t. Light, regular, stiff and extra stiff flex.UST Mamiya Helium Black 4 Graphite shaft.Project X EvenFlow Riptide 60 Graphite shaft.Project X EvenFlow Riptide 50 Graphite shaft.Aldila Rogue White 130 MSI 70 Graphite shaft.Aldila Rogue White 130 MSI 60 Graphite shaft.While all 3 versions feature Jailbreak bars and SS20 Flash faces, the Max and Sub Zero are the only ones with interchangeable weights. The standard Mavrik is the only one with the elongated “Cyclone Aero” head shape. The standard Mavrik was released alongside the Mavrik Max and Mavrik Sub Zero. When you swing these 2 drivers side by side, you can also tell that the XR driver has a lower CG than the X Hot, hits the ball further and justifies the extra price. With the XR, you get an 8-point adjustable hosel, a crown with a leading edge and a lighter, thinner face. The XR driver is essentially a more advanced version of the X Hot. The Mavrik also has a different, more elongated and aero dynamic head shape than the X Hot driver.
Callaway x hot driver womens series#
The list of differences between the Callaway Mavrik and the X Hot drivers is longer.Ĭallaway stepped away from VFT for the Mavrik series – opting instead for titanium Flash Face which, is thinner, lighter and more resilient. The main similarity is that they both feature an adjustable hosel that allows you to tweak loft and lie. The Mavrik has come a long way from the X Hot driver so there are very few spec similarities. The result is straighter shots across the expanse of the face. The face is thinner around the perimeter and thicker in the center or sweet spot. The Callaway X Hot driver features one of the earliest iteration of Variable Face Thickness. The Mavrik also features Jailbreak bars to stabilize the incredibly thin, hot face. helped Callaway sort through millions of drive scenarios to come up with the face architecture to accommodate more varying situations. The Mavrik features FS2S titanium which is 6 grams lighter than normal titanium.Ī.I. There is always some overlap – they are both Callaway drivers after all.īut the Mavrik obviously has more modern features while the X Hot driver takes a more analog approach to ball speed.
Where these 2 drivers diverge from each other is how they produce ball speed. Right off the bat, the central thesis behind both of these drivers is the same: produce more ball speed for longer drives. But do you need to spend a lot on a newer model?ĭo older models perform just as well in 2021? To answer this question we are going to pit a modern Callaway driver against one of yesteryear to see how they compare. Stressful because it can be hard to determine how much you need to spend.Ĭallaway drivers are known for performance – that’s a given. Having cause to be in the market for a new driver can be an exciting and stressful situation.Įxciting because you know you’re going to get your hands on a new driver. Callaway Mavrik Vs Callaway X Hot Driver Review & Comparison
0 kommentar(er)
